According to a press release from the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), a non-profit organization devoted to “promoting personal responsibility and protecting consumer choices,” People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (better known as PETA) killed a whopping 95 percent of adoptable pets in their care in 2008.
Here’s an excerpt:
“WASHINGTON DC – Today the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) published documents online showing that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) killed 95 percent of the adoptable pets in its care during 2008. Despite years of public outrage over its euthanasia program, the animal rights group kills an average of 5.8 pets every day at its Norfolk, VA headquarters.
According to public records from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, PETA killed 2,124 pets last year and placed only seven in adoptive homes. Since 1998, a total of 21,339 dogs and cats have died at the hands of PETA workers.
Despite having a $32 million budget, PETA does not operate an adoption shelter. PETA employees make no discernible effort to find homes for the thousands of pets they kill every year. Last year, the Center for Consumer Freedom petitioned Virginia’s State Veterinarian to reclassify PETA as a slaughterhouse.”
The rest of the story is continued here on their website.

BOSS models get naked to support PETA campaign: "I'd rather go naked than wear fur"
This image is protected by a creative commons license. It belongs to PETA and is reprinted here with proper attribution and without the endorsement of PETA or their affiliates. This image can be found on www.furisdead.com.
Issues? After perusing the web for a bit, I found several feminist/pro-feminist sites that take issues with PETA’s objectification of the female body as a way to sell their point. Many feminists found it to be a cheap shock and awe tactic that lacked the ability to really intellectually rouse the public. At first glance we can discount the sexist pitch for the ad above because it denudes both men and women — leveling the gender playinbg field for men and women alike. The problem with that analysis is that it fails to take into account a few things. First, the bodies of these men and women are still being objectified — their simultaneous objectification doesn’t lessen the degree to which PETA is culpable of reducing our sum to our parts. Another problem is that both the male and female models, like most mainstream models today, look like proud hosts of an eating disorder. If the message they want to focus on is the equal treatment of animals, I suggest they drop the ‘sex sells’ pitch that objectifies the female (and male) body and reaffirms society’s worst suspicions about what PETA is really saying: It’s cool to get naked for animal rights while starving in the face of your own body’s demands.
To be fair, PETA has done some great work in promoting animal cruelty awareness and sparking direct action against inhumane animal treatment like seal slaughter (which takes primarily in Canada), the fur industry and laboratory animal testing. Please take a moment to check out their site and make up your own mind.
PETA
Signing off as your journalist with a conscience,
M.L.C